- Home
- I Blog
- I Tweet
- I Listen
- I Shoot
- I Watch
- Contact
-
Posts
- Apr 15, 12
Let me get this out of the way first: I am not a filmmaker, film student or a connoisseur. I'm just a schmuck who really likes movies, and I'm not afraid to read up on subjects which tickle my fancy. With his in mind, many of my opinions on the matter may be skewed, based upon dubious assumptions, or just flat-out wrong.
Recently I've read a number of articles which have popped up highlighting the film industry's growing preference for digital media. Some of them boast an almost tear-jerking level of nostalgia for a dying technology, while others offer arguments in favour of digital which are, at best, mootable.
Let's settle on one fact: 35mm is the gold standard for the foreseeable future. This is exemplified by the fact that the best digital motion picture cameras out there simply attempt - as best they can - to imitate the look and feel of 35mm. When done correctly, film will always look better than any comparable purely digital technology. This comes with a caveat, though: shooting on film and getting through the entire post-production workflow "correctly" is difficult and it is expensive.Chris Nolan with a 35mm Panavision Panaflex XL2
In a recent LA Weekly article, Christopher Nolan proselytised and pleaded for the continued use of 35mm film. His argument is that the elegance and power of film outweighs any financial benefits to dropping the medium.
The truth is that the studios are fully justified in supporting - if not forcing - the adoption of digital, as it is simply cheaper. Let's keep in mind that they are running businesses and not art studios.
One reel of standard 35mm film is roughly 300 metres in length. When recorded at industry-standard 24 frames per second, this gives you a speed of 456 millimetres per second, which translates to roughly eleven minutes of footage. Compare this to the Red Epic digital cinema camera[1] (used to photograph such upcoming films as Ridley Scott's Prometheus and Peter Jackson's The Hobbit) recording at 5k 2:1 and REDcode 5:1 (which will likely be what most features shoot with) onto a 256GB SSD[2] will net you just under an hour.Red Epic-M with all the trimmings.
This obviously allows the crew to focus more on the artistry of what they're doing, and less on timing their takes correctly. The knowledge that the SSD can be overwritten (as opposed to a bum reel which must be trashed) also relaxes everyone involved, as a mistake does not mean blowing a $500 reel.
Another issue which needs to be addressed is that of data loss. Digital's strength in this regard is obvious: film - being an analogue technology - cannot be losslessly copied. That is to say, a copy will always be inferior to the original - a copy of a copy doubly so. The SSDs that are used in digital, on the other hand, are really just examples of newer hard drives that you'll find on any modern desktop PC. This means that the footage which it contains is nothing but a digital file - a huge chunk of binary data. As we all know, digital data can be copied ad infinitum with no loss of quality. This is great news for editors, and - again - introduces massive financial savings. Unfortunately, the SSDs in question are, again, simply glorified hard drives. As someone with vast experience in the field of I.T., I can assure you that any flash/EEPROM based storage degrades much faster than anything you can imagine. While an adequately sealed reel of film can last centuries, you'd be lucky to get a lifespan exceeding five years from a flash hard disk.Red's proprietary SSDs
known as RedMags
Personally, I'm in favour of eventually migrating completely to digital cinema, but not yet. Despite the technology massively lowering the barrier-to-entry for professional quality filmmaking, 35mm film has some beautiful light-capturing qualities and nuances that digital just cannot yet measure up to. The inexorable march of technology, however, suggests that the quality of digital cameras and projection will continue to improve and eventually surpass film. At the moment, we're just at the mercy of producers who favour bottom-line over beauty.
[1] The Epic-M and Epic-X models have approximately the same surface area of a traditional Super 35 film frame masked to the 1.85:1 aspect ratio, creating a similar angle of view and depth of field as the Super 35 film format.
[2] SSD: Solid State Drive. A modern hard-disk technology which features no moving parts and, thus, fewer points of failure. Basically a bigger version of a USB flash stick. - Apr 10, 12
Lately I've been thinking and reading about the subject of film more than usual. At a certain point the question came up concerning which movies a film student or aficionado should study - or at least watch. Though a risky endeavour to attempt to distill the entire history of world cinema into a single list, here's my attempt at a good introduction which would promote general understanding and the desire for further study:
Early film:
The Muybridge race horse, the Lumiere brothers' first play bill, Melies' Le Voyage dans la lune, McCay's Sinking of the Lusitania
Editing:
the Kuleshov experiment, Sergei Eisenstein's Battleship Potemkin, Hitchcock's Psycho, Korine's Gummo
Sound:
Crosland's The Jazz Singer, Hitchcock's Blackmail, Lang's M, Demy's The Umbrellas of Cherbourg, de Palma's Blow Out
Colour:
Disney's Flowers and Trees, Fleming's The Wizard of Oz, Kurosawa's Dodes'kaden, the Coen Bros. O Brother, Where Art Thou?
The Development of the Hollywood Style:
Edison's The Great Train Robbery, Griffith's Birth of a Nation, Chaplin's City Lights, Welles' Citizen Kane, Spielberg's Jaws
Hollywood before and after the Production Code:
Kubrick's Lolita, Penn's Bonnie and Clyde, Bertolucci's Last Tango In Paris, Spielberg's Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom, the Farrelly Bros. There's Something About Mary, Aronofsky's Requiem For a Dream
Important European movements:
German expressionism - Wiene's Das Cabinet des Dr. Caligari, French New Wave - Godard's À bout de souffle, Italian Neo-Realism - de Sica's Ladri di biciclette, Russian Avant Garde - Vertov's Man With a Movie Camera, Eisenstein's October
National cinemas:
British - Reed's The Third Man, Greenaway's The Cook, the Thief, His Wife & Her Lover and Leigh's Naked; Chinese: Zhang's Red Sorghum, Chen's Farewell, My Concubine, and Zhang's Beijing Bastards; Japanese - Kurosawa's Rashomon, Ozu's Tokyo Monogatari, Koreeda's After Life; Korean: Bong's The Host and Park's Oldboy; Russian - Tarkovsky's Andrei Rublev and Bekmambetov's Night Watch
Other major directors:
Capra's Mr. Smith Goes to Washington, Hawks' The Big Sleep, Ford's Stagecoach, Bergman's Wild Strawberries, Herzog's Aguirre, Wrath of God, von Trier's Breaking the Waves, Scorsese's Taxi Driver, Coppola's Apocalypse Now, Polanksi's Chinatown, Malick's Days of Heaven, Altman's Short Cuts,
Billy Wilder's Some Like it Hot and Sunset Boulevard
American independents:
Bogdanovich's The Last Picture Show, Cassavettes' A Woman Under the Influence, Lee's Do the Right Thing, Soderbergh's Sex, Lies & Videotape, Romero's Night of the Living Dead, Anderson's Bottle Rocket, Tarantino's Resevoir Dogs, Russell's Spanking the Monkey
Avant Garde:
Deren's Meshes of the Afternoon, Brakhage's Dog Star Man (probably in excerpt), Bunuel and Dali's Un chien Andalou, Barney's Cremaster
Addendum: I actually find myself tempted to make a separate list for animated films that are worth watching for their cinematic and/or historical value, such as Sleeping Beauty, the gorgeous Waltz with Bashir, or just about anything by the unfailingly brilliant Hayao Miyazaki. - Jan 22, 12
"A well nourished Sudanese man steals maize from a starving child during a food distribution at Medecins Sans Frontieres feeding centre at Ajiep, southern Sudan, in 1998"
Look at this child. The food would be wasted on him. He would eat too much of it, if he could eat at all, and would be sick, vomiting it and not being able to control his hunger. The ideal situation would be for someone to give it to him little bits at a time, but there's no logistical way to have volunteers do that for everyone who needs it.
For the man stealing the food, it is sustenance. For the child, it is a cruel delaying of the inevitable.
Our destiny exercises its influence over us even when, as yet, we have not learned its nature: it is our future that lays down the law of our today. Once we forget that morality is nothing but a herd instinct in the individual, we forget that our purpose is to overcome the weak in favour of the strong for the eventual benefit of an entire species.
It is absurd to cling to hope when through hopelessness we define our reality. - Dec 07, 11
When I decided that I too must pass through the experience of a parachute jump, life rose to a higher level, to a sort of exhilarated calmness. The thought of crawling out onto the struts and wires hundreds of feet above the earth, and then giving up even that tenuous hold of safety and of substance, left me a feeling of anticipation mixed with dread, of confidence restrained by caution, of courage salted through with fear. How tightly should one hold onto life? How loosely give it rein? What gain was there for such a risk? I would have to pay in money for hurling my body into space. There would be no crowd to watch and applaud my landing. Nor was there any scientific objective to be gained. No, there was deeper reason for wanting to jump, a desire I could not explain.
Charles Lindbergh was on to something there; when I signed up for my First Jump Course in pursuit of a new hobby, I could fathom nary an iota of the love affair with the sky that would develop from those first steps.The process was not without typical human doubt and apprehension:"Why am I doing this? What am I trying to prove?"Stepping out onto the strut, pushed towards oblivion by a prop wash stronger than any wind I had yet felt, fear gave way to focus. Those long hours of training and drills had finally marched to the point of application; no room for error, no time for hesitation.As I let go of the strut, of the final tether which comforted me with its illusion of connectedness with the Earth, I fell into an answer to the last question."Why am I doing this?"I found an answer that escapes my capacity for elucidation, but an answer that has me returning to the breast of oblivion again and again for as long as I am able. - Aug 28, 11
Imagine you have two balls. These balls really don't want to touch each other but if you put a lot of energy into forcing them to, they explode releasing tons of energy.
This is called nuclear fusion. The balls are certain atoms and the energy is usually extremely high temperatures(millions of degrees). Instead of making the two atoms touch you are combining them into one larger atom. This process is what the sun is doing to create all of its energy.
Cold fusion is the term for a Nuclear Fusion reaction that can be done at a relatively cooler temperature and other conditions that we can create on earth. Although currently there is no cold fusion technique that produces more energy than what is required to sustain the reaction, Emc2 is currently working on a Polywell fusor that seems to produce more energy than it consumes. It is currently being funded by the Navy.
I'm pretty sure, though, that they wouldn't want to be associated with the term cold fusion, owing to its pseudoscientific stigma. - Aug 17, 11
Let's say you cut a piece of stainless steel in half with a magic knife that maintains the structure of all the atoms but just separates them. That would be an ideal cut; just breaking the chemical bonds that hold the material together. Now, what if you tried to put it back together a few minutes later? Somewhat surprisingly, the pieces wouldn't stick together. The reason is that the surfaces of many materials are different from the bulk material on the inside. In the case of stainless steel, the surface gets oxidized by the atmosphere to make a layer of iron oxide a few atoms thick. This prevents the surfaces from making a perfect match again.
So why does this happen? There are two reasons, really. The first is that oxygen will react with pretty much anything it can get its hands on. It makes especially strong bonds with iron. The second is that when you break a bond, you're actually adding energy to the atoms, and this energy can be used to facilitate a chemical reaction with something else that they come in contact with.
Now you decide to get clever and do this same experiment in space, or a good vacuum chamber. If you still use your magic knife so that there is no grain (crystal lattice, really) mismatch when you put your pieces back together, they should stick.
This phenomenon of separate two pieces of metal stick together does happen in our atmosphere, especially with stainless steel. It's usually not a good idea to use stainless steel screws to hold together something made of stainless steel. If you screw it in really tight, you can scratch off the protective layer of iron oxide on the surfaces, exposing the pure metal underneath, which can then, over time, form new metal-metal bonds. This process is called galling. - Aug 16, 11
3.14159265358979323846264338327950288419716939937510582097494459230781640628620899862803482534211706798214808651328230664709384460955058223172535940812848111745028410270193852110555964462294895493038196442881097566593344612847564823378678316527120190914564856692346034861045432664821339360726024914127372458700660631558817488152092096282925409171536436789259036001133053054882046652138414695194151160943305727036575959195309218611738193261179310511854807446237996274956735188575272489122793818301194912983367336244065664308602139494639522473719070217986094370277053921717629317675238467481846766940513200056812714526356082778577134275778960917363717872146844090122495343014654958537105079227968925892354201995611212902196086403441815981362977477130996051870721134999999 and so on.
- Aug 14, 11
Kurt Gödel found a solution to Einstein's equations for General Relativity where time is meaningless, because every point in spacetime can access every other point in spacetime through Closed Timelike Curves.
In other words, he found a solution to Einstein's equation where you can trivially time travel to any point in history from any point in space, a clear violation of Einstein (and most every other physicist's) views on the nature of time.
It can be defined as follows:
where ω is a nonzero real constant, which turns out to be the angular velocity, as measured by a nonspinning observer riding any one of the arbitrary points.
Gödel never explained how he found his solution, but there are many possible derivations. Let's see one here:
Start with a simple frame in a cylindrical type chart, featuring two undetermined functions of the radial coordinate:
Think of the timelike unit vector field e0 as a tangent to the lines of arbitrary points.
Following Gödel, we can interpret the arbitrary points as galaxies, so that the Gödel interpretation becomes a cosmological model of a rotating universe. Because this model exhibits no Hubble expansion, it is not a realistic model of the universe in which we live, but can be taken as illustrating an alternative universe which would in principle be allowed by general relativity (if one admits the legitimacy of a nonzero cosmological constant). - Aug 10, 11
I've pumped enough Quetiapine into myself to kill you three times over, but you're still here. Still mocking me with your lingering and your deadbelly comminations.
Rest assured, your days are numbered. I will kill you, one way or the other. - Aug 03, 11
Dassler Brothers Shoe Factory was created by Adolf and Rudolf, two brothers. They specialized in track/athletic spikes. They became estranged during the rise of Hitler, during and after the war, and, as a result of this, Rudolf left the company and Adi renamed the company after his own nickname: Adi-das. His brother went across town and started a new shoe company known to us as Puma.
In 2009, both companies decided to bury the hatchet by playing a friendly game of soccer football to end the 60-year rift. The match took place between workers from both companies within the framework of the “Peace One Day” initiative, an annual day of global ceasefire and non-violence.
The ensuing riot killed 3 and injured 18. - Jul 26, 11
Change fucking everything.
Look at your life; it's not a buildup, it's a countdown. You're in a doped up antipsychotic haze which you're trying to pass off as a life. Are you suicidal? No, but you are busy killing yourself through crimes of omission. But take heart: only through disaster can we be truly resurrected.
An exploding universe contains nothing but the remnants of what could have been, but is not. Everything else is wasted potential and wasted matter. Nothing is quite as sublime as an unrealised ideal.
Are you socially isolating yourself? No? Is what you have any better? Look at the people with whom you surround yourself. Are they people worth emulating? No? Then why are they still there? To be fully couched in the comfort of a friend is a mode of existence with severe implications. To please you perfectly, she must understand you perfectly. Thus you cannot defy her expectations or escape her reach. Her benevolence has circumscribed you, and your life's achievements will not reach beyond the map she has drawn.
Are you in a job you can't stand but are too afraid to leave? At the end of every day, is the overarching question, "Was this day a complete waste?" Nothing is ever solved when the day is over, but nothing matters.
Take a long, hard look at your life, your routines, your peers, your job, your family. Are they yours, or are you theirs? You need an emotional response of some type. Something to remind the world - and yourself - that you are still, despite everything, a human being. It's easy to cry when you realise that everyone you love will reject you or die. This is therapy. Tears are salvation. Pain is resurrection. A little suffering is good for the soul.
Drive off a cliff, fuck someone, go on a shooting spree, do anything, but don't just sit there with a stupid, self-satisfied smirk on your face waiting for the clock to run out. What are you? Nothing. You just are. The cancer you don't have is everywhere now.
Change fucking everything. - Jul 17, 11
This sentence has five words. Here are five more words. Five-word sentences are fine. But several together become monotonous. Listen to what is happening. The writing is getting boring. The sound of it drones. It’s like a stuck record. The ear demands some variety. Now listen. I vary the sentence length, and I create music. Music. The writing sings. It has a pleasant rhythm, a lilt, a harmony. I use short sentences. And I use sentences of medium length. And sometimes, when I am certain the reader is rested, I will engage him with a sentence of considerable length, a sentence that burns with energy and builds with all the impetus of a crescendo, the roll of the drums, the crash of the cymbals–sounds that say listen to this, it is important.
- Jul 12, 11
Somewhere, parently, in the ginnandgo gap in between antediluvious and annadominant; the axenwise cleft in the dontmind; the gap in between you and me; is there found a puir spring of scribicide.
one by one we're all becoming shadows, and i will die and you will die and we will all die and even the stars will fade out in time. tis as human a story as paper could carry well, but the cluekey to the worldroom is the honeying of the lune: love. the waxing of the moon above. uncertain comets chancedrifting into one another, exploding like spiders across the stars. together. transient as the pure cold light in the sky: from round to crescent from crescent to round they range.
Parked so dark by her kindlelight, I'm frisqued by her frasques and her prytty phyrrique. This mischievmiss burns an incandescending indigonation; a feroxysm in the uncorked cor. - Jul 04, 11
For those of you who actually read my blog (bless your hearts), you've no doubt come to accept me as an eccentric individual at the best of times. Unfortunately recent events have ascribed a disturbing aesculapian dimension to it.
I've had what most would not be loathe to describe as a nightmare month: I've lost my father; the very next day I was involved in a car accident; a week later a childhood friend died under violent circumstances; and a little over a week before the writing of this post one of my best friends took her own life. All of these calamities coupled with the typical difficulties associated with a high-stress line of work have most recently led me down a dark path.
I have experienced symptoms associated with psychtotic mental disorders: visual and auditory hallucinations, delusions, extreme paranoia, etc. The nature of these symptoms has varied from benign (voices commenting dully on my actions) to malignant (refusal to eat due to a delusional fear of being poisoned). I was passed from doctor to doctor and eventually made my way to a psychiatrist who, upon reviewing my medical and psychological history, diagnosed me with schizophrenia.
According to the physician in question, the condition has most likely been with me for a long time - possibly years - but due to its mildness has remained largely asymptomatic (or, at least, with symptoms mild enough that they cause little distress and are easily managed without ever triggering the urge to seek professional help).
Seeing as the condition has been wildly exacerbated by my recent prolonged period of intense stress, the headshrinker has opted temporarily to put me on a course of strong tranquilizers (benzodiazepine) in order to determine whether a relief in stress may bring about a relief in the psychotic symptoms. Unfortunately symptoms have persisted since entering into this course of treatment, so I will almost certainly end up on a chronic course of antipsychotics and intensive psychotherapy.
The status quo has obviously compelled me to do some reading which has alleviated some of the myths surrounding the illness, which - in turn - has made me a great deal less fearful and anxious about the entire situation. - Jul 04, 11
Attaining a higher state of consciousness is a bête noire for the unready; regressing to a former state of being surpassing our occupied reality. We give it labels because we're haughty, but the awakening of the formerly abandoned recesses of the mind expedites some species of emendation in us. Fear is a natural reaction to being well adjusted in a profoundly sick society.
- Jul 03, 11
Don't be afraid. You're regressing to a primative but desirable state of being, akin to the amorphous mass of consciousness which predates the ostensibly objective reality which you choose to occupy.
- Apr 11, 11
Like most people of the time, I find myself falling into love to the soundtrack of famine and war. The object of my adulation is bequeathed a recondite beauty. A transcendant presence. Oddly, she never looks directly at me. Skittish. Uncertain. Scared. Occasionally I catch glimpses of her bare soul through a reflection of a reflection, but her reckless aloofness drowns me in the realisation that my fault, my failure, is not in my passions, but in my lack of control of them.
If only she could let go. Dive into absolution from the weight which fastens her gaze to the safety of her feet. If only she would look up, I imagine she'd see the scattered evening sky reflected in my dark pupils.
Has this happened yet? No. Will it? I don't know.
Are you worried? Because I'm not. - Mar 18, 11
In today's glorious world of mobile computing and smartphones, the line which separates "mobile devices" from actual computers is becoming increasingly blurred and will soon disappear entirely.
Many individuals have taken to using their smartphones as broadband connections for other devices such as laptops and netbooks in a process commonly known as "tethering". As far as convenience goes, the benefits are pretty clear: a single, portable Internet access point for use with whichever device is most readily available at the time.
Unfortunately many providers in various countries have taken steps to either reduce or profit from this activity by either making tethering a violation of their terms of service, or offering a separate "tethering package" - which essentially amounts to making you pay an additional service overhead whenever you want to use your phone as a modem for another device.
Legality and ethics aside, this article isn't meant to focus on the why, but rather on the how. Specifically, how can they tell you're tethering, and what can be done to circumvent it? We'll approach these one at a time.
How can they tell?
All IP packets have a field known as the TTL. This stands for the Time To Live. Every "hop" a datagram takes from one router to the next on the way to its destination reduces the TTL by one. Once the TTL reaches zero, the packet is dropped.
This functionality was implemented so that packets affected by some routing error and which find themselves going in a circle will eventually simply disappear as soon as their TTL reaches 0, instead of snowballing into a packet storm. All routing devices do this, and generally it's a Good Thing.
All operating systems have a standard TTL set on outgoing datagrams up to a maximum possible value of 255. Let's assume that both your Windows laptop and your iPhone have a TTL of 128. When you connect to the Internet directly from your phone, the data packets leave the device and hit your network provider's router (the first hop) with a TTL of 128. The router will decrement the value by one to 127 as the packet leaves their network on its way to the Internet.
On the other hand if you're connecting from a laptop using your iPhone, the phone itself is acting as a router and any packets originating on the laptop will have a TTL of 127 as soon as they hit your provider's router. In this way they can see that there was an additional network hop before the packet reached them, and from this they logically deduce that the iPhone is tethered to a laptop/notebook/whatever.
Okay, so how can we get around that?
The most obvious solution is to modify the TTL of the datagrams at their source. If, as in the example above, the TTL on your iPhone is set to 128, changing the default TTL on your laptop to 129 will mean that after the value is decremented by your phone, the provider will receive a packet with the expected TTL of 128. To them it will appear as though you're browsing directly from your phone.
Unfortunately there is one caveat: If the TTL on your mobile device is set to 255, I'm afraid you're shit-outta-luck. Seeing as the TTL is an 8-bit field in IPv4 packets, it can only accomodate 256 possible values: 0 - 255. You cannot possibly set it to 256 on any device ever. Fortunately in most circumstances this is not the case.
According to Deutsche Telekom Laboratories (PDF), "The default IP TTLs of popular MHDs (mobile hand-held devices) differ from those of the most commonly used home OSs. The default TTL of iPhones/iPods and Macs is 64, Symbian uses 69, while Windows uses 128. This enables us to separate MHD usage from regular PC."
To modify the default TTL in Windows, do the following:- Click on Start and Run (or Search) and type "regedit" to open the Windows registry editor.
- Navigate to the following registry key: [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Tcpip\Parameters]
- In the right-hand pane, right-click and select "New - DWORD (32-bit value)" and set its name to "DefaultTTL" and its value to anything between 0 and 255.
A few last thoughts.
Already a few possible questions pop up in my head.
"Why not just spoof my User Agent when browsing?" I have always been and remain against spoofing of User Agents. Not only does it damage the efficacy of legitimate browser statistics, but it simply does not work. It's like a burglar who begins to meow after being caught red-handed in the hope that you'll assume he's a kitten and leave him alone. Any device, application or extension that promises to protect you by spoofing your UA is snake oil.
"Isn't there some other way that they can tell?" Frankly yes, but you don't need to worry about it. This would require deep packet inspection, and for any ISP who would benefit from disallowing or charging for tethering, DPI would be prohibitively expensive.
"Can I get in trouble doing this?" No. Changing the default TTL on your laptop/netbook/PC is absolutely not prohibited by any law. Just don't e-mail your mobile provider boasting about how you "cleverly" circumvented their tethering policy. You'll find your contract voided painfully fast.
"Can I damage my computer or my network doing this?" As long as you don't set the TTL inordinately low nor go out of your way to do stupid things with firewalls, you'll be fine. Imagine a TTL set to 5 and after a 4-hop loop the packet arrives back at your router. The loop will continue indefinitely until you reboot the router.
In summary, TTLs are serious business!
Good luck and have fun! - Mar 14, 11
As is normal for a group of people who work together, every once in a while at our office an email gets sent out - usually by the boss - hilighting and chastising some egregious behaviour; be it anything from unprofessional conduct with a client to a lack of hygene in the bathroom.
A personal observation is that, usually without variance, every member of our staff (bear in mind, we are a small company of only 8 employees, all sharing a single office) replies with some form of indignation at the behaviour described. Seeing as at least one member of staff must be guilty of said behaviour, the fact that there is a universal display of scorn introduces an ostensible paradox.
From a purely cognitive point of view, this phenomenon never ceases to fascinate me, and I believe it treads into the realm of a branch of mathematics known as game theory.
When the original email enters the wilderness of the office network, the initial reaction of everyone involved is to speculate as to whom the guilty party might be; a zero-sum game is created. By responding with (sincere or pseudo) indignation, the individual believes himself to be removed from the pool of possible suspects. However, the consequences of this behaviour are purely mathematical and fully predictable.
As the pool of possible suspects shrinks, so does the likelihood increase that more individuals will react with this form of veiled denial in order to remove themselves from the pool and eliminate any chance of suspicion. Of course, the guilty party (or parties) must play this game too, in order to avert suspicion. This eventually leads to the absurd conclusion that everyone appears to be in equal disgust at behaviour in which at least one of the parties involved must surely have participated. Thus, everyone involved ends up looking even more foolish.
This is a variation of the so-called prisoner's dilemma that is occasionally found in game theory. As the dilemma itself illustrates, the best possible outcome for all parties involved is to accept, each and equally, some measure of the guilt and for no single individual to deny any burden of the guilt. In this way, the shared guilt amounts to less of a loss than the shared foolishness of the absurdity of a universal denial in the face of evidence to the contrary.
The dilemma, of course, is that none of the parties involved cooperates, even though it's in everyone's best interest to do so.
In this example we see mathematical principles being highlighted in our daily interactions, and not simply being relegated to the notebooks of mathematicians. - Feb 26, 11
So a friend and I were bored the other day and played some Jenga. After what seemed like literally minutes, we got bored and gave up, at which point I completed construction on a monument that would make the Druids themselves weep: Jenga-henge.
Glorious Jenga-henge May it stand for a thousand years!
But as the legend foretells, the completion of this decadent monument angered the old gods! They sent in their most vicious monsters as retribution for this vulgar display of ego!"What's this, then?" Destruction! Oh, the humanity! A challenger appears... Tag-team destruction. Surveying the carnage. Jenga-henge is no more. "What?"
May the legend of Jenga-henge live forever, and serve as a lesson to those consumed by hubris. - Jan 15, 11
Have you noticed how everyone and their mother claims photography as a hobby nowadays? Do you know why? I'll cut right through the bullshit: because it's easy.
Okay, that's a bit of an explosive statement; good photography is everything but easy, in much the same way that good abstract expressionism is - I would imagine - extremely fucking difficult to pull off, but that doesn't stop anyone capable of projectile defecating paint from calling themselves an "artist".Jackson Pollock was a genius. Whoever came up with this abomination, well...
Which brings me neatly to the next point in this disjointed rant: photography is the oil-on-canvas of the twenty first century. Anyone within snatching distance of a camera is equipped to take a picture and plaster it on their Flickr profile, but that doesn't make them a photographer any more than taking a laxative would make me a proctologist.
Annie Leibovitz, Robert Mapplethorpe... These people are photographers. You? You're an asshole with a camera, too much time, and not enough negative reinforcement.
Addendum: Yes, I do recall that I, too, have a Flickr profile. However, I've never claimed to be a photographer nor denied being a hypocrite. - Jan 14, 11
Recently I was asked by a client to develop a load balancing solution over two of their ADSL lines, but only for http traffic, and only for specific users. Sounds like a pain in the ass, right? Well, it was.
Essentially they've got four ADSL links:- eth0: 111.111.111.111 (main uncapped line)
- eth1: 100.100.100.11
- eth2: 100.100.100.22
- eth3: 100.100.100.33
eth0 is the default route where all traffic goes through, and eth3 is used for something else.
They're using Squid as their proxy server, and want all traffic for a specific Squid ACL (let's call it "employees") to be load balanced between eth1 and eth2.
My biggest worry was in how to set this up without having to alter the default route on the system, but - as is always the case with Linux - there is a way if you look hard enough.
My first thought was to use iptables to mark packets, then set up an iproute2 rule to pick up on those packets and forward them to the relevant routing table. Unfortunately, the best one could do with this method is manipulate all http traffic, however, as mentioned, only the traffic for specific users must be load balanced.
Obviously, this method won't work.
The key to the solution is Squid's TCP_OUTGOING_TOS configuration directive. This directive allows one to set the TOS value in outgoing IP packets on a per-ACL basis. What this means is that if you have an ACL called "employees", you can have all traffic generated by the users in that ACL have the TOS set to an arbitrary value. You can then use an iproute2 rule to pick up on all packets with that value set and do whatever you want with them. Bingo!
Firstly, we need to create three routing tables: ADSL1, ADSL2 and BALANCE. This is usually done in /etc/iproute2/rt_tables.
Then we begin adding routing information:# Assumes 100.100.100.10 is the address of the router on eth1ip route add 100.100.100.9/29 dev eth1 src 100.100.100.11 table ADSL1ip route add default via 100.100.100.10 table ADSL1# Assumes 100.100.100.21 is the address of the router on eth2ip route add 100.100.100.20/29 dev eth2 src 100.100.100.22 table ADSL2ip route add default via 100.100.100.21 table ADSL2
Now we add some rules# eth1 traffic goes to table ADSL1ip rule add from 100.100.100.11 table ADSL1# eth2 traffic goes to table ADSL2ip rule add from 100.100.100.22 table ADSL2# Squid sets desired traffic TOS. Marked traffic goes to table BALANCEip rule add tos 0x0c table BALANCE
And finally we create the multilink route in the table BALANCE.
ip route add default scope global table BALANCE nexthop via 100.100.100.10 dev eth1 weight 1 nexthop via 100.100.100.21 dev eth2 weight 1
Then finally, in your Squid configuration, simply add the configuration directivetcp_outgoing_tos 0x0c employees
That's pretty much it. iptraf confirms that all http traffic for the desired ACL gets balanced over eth1 and eth2. Obviously the load balancing won't be perfect due to route caching, etc. But it probably is the most beautiful solution possible without splashing out on a pricey Cisco router or some such.
For more information, be sure to read the Linux Advanced Routing & Traffic Control HOWTO. - Mar 28, 10
So, earlier today my friend and I end up talking over coffee about some fond childhood shows. He mentions an old show broadcast for a short time here during the 80s, but originally from the early 70s I think. It was called Candle Cove, and was about a girl who's friends with imaginary pirates (played by puppets) with an incredibly creepy villain. I'm talking the stuff of nightmares, here. Unbelievable what they passed off as kids shows back then, but I digress.
What triggered my curiosity - and nostalgia - was when he mentioned that it gave him strange recurring dreams. I was too young to remember exactly - so maybe it's just a false memory brought up by the conversation - but I'm rather sure the show gave me nightmares as well. The last episode in particular was, well, odd.
I looked into it, and I've never really experienced a comparable level of being both nostalgic and freaked out at the same time.
After scouring the net for a while, I came across a few articles on the show, including the following discussion taken from a forum thread from about four or five years ago:
Candle Cove
NetNostalgia Forum - Television (local)
Skyshale033
Subject: Candle Cove local kid's show?
Does anyone remember this kid's show? It was called Candle Cove and I must have been 6 or 7, I never found reference to it anywhere so I think it was on a local station around 1971 or 1972. I lived in Ironton at the time. I don't remember which station, but I do remember it was on at a weird time, like 4:00 PM.
mike_painter65
Subject: Re: Candle Cove local kid's show?
it seems really familiar to me.....i grew up outside of ashland and was 9 yrs old in 72. candle cov...wasit about pirates? i remember a pirate marionete at the mouth of a cave talking to a little girl
Skyshale033
Subject: Re: Candle Cove local kid's show?
YES! Okay I'm not crazy! I remember Pirate Percy. I was always kind of scared of him. He looked like he was built from parts of other dolls, real low-budget. His head was an old porcelain baby doll, looked like an antique that didn't belong on the body. I don't remember what station this was! I don't think it was WTSF though.
Jaren_2005
Subject: Re: Candle Cove local kid's show?
Sorry to ressurect this old thread but I know exactly what show you mean, Skyshale. I think Candle Cove ran for only a couple months in '71, not '72. I was 12 and I watched it a few times with my brother. It was channel 58, whatever station that was. My mom would let me switch to it after the news- Let me see what I remember.
It took place in Candle cove, and it was about a little girl who imagined herself to be friends with pirates. The pirate ship was called the Laughingstock, and Pirate Percy wasn't a very good pirate because he got scared too easily. And there was calliope music constantly playing. Don't remember the girl's name. Janice or Jade or something. Think it was Janice.
Skyshale033
Subject: Re: Candle Cove local kid's show?
Thank you Jaren!!! Memories flooded back when you mentioned the Laughingstock and channel 58. I remember the bow of the ship was a wooden smiling face, with the lower jaw submerged. It looked like it was swallowing the sea and it had that awful Ed Wynn voice and laugh. I especially remember how jarring it was when they switched from the wooden/plastic model, to the foam puppet version of the head that talked.
mike_painter65
Subject: Re: Candle Cove local kid's show?
ha ha i remember now too. :) do you remember this part skyshale: "you have...to go...INSIDE"
Skyshale033
Subject: Re: Candle Cove local kid's show?
Ugh mike, I got a chill reading that. Yes I remember. That's what the ship always told Percy when there was a spooky place he had to go in, like a cave or a dark room where the treasure was. And the camera would push in on Laughingstock's face with each pause. YOU HAVE... TO GO... INSIDE. With his two eyes askew and that flopping foam jaw and the fishing line that opened and closed it. Ugh. It just looked so cheap and awful.
You guys remember the villain? He had a face that was just a handlebar mustache above really tall, narrow teeth.
kevin_hart
Subject: Re: Candle Cove local kid's show?
i honestly, honestly thought the villain was pirate percy- i was about 5 when this show was on. nightmare fuel.
Jaren_2005
Subject: Re: Candle Cove local kid's show?
That wasn't the villain, the puppet with the mustache. That was the villain's sidekick, Horace Horrible. He had a monocle too, but it was on top of the mustache. I used to think that meant he had only one eye. But yeah, the villain was another marionette. The Skin-Taker. I can't believe what they let us watch back then.
kevin_hart
Subject: Re: Candle Cove local kid's show?
jesus h. christ, the skin taker. what kind of a kids show were we watching? i seriously could not look at the screen when the skin taker showed up. he just descended out of nowhere on his strings, just a dirty skeleton wearing that brown top hat and cape. and his glass eyes that were too big for his skull. christ almighty.
Skyshale033
Subject: Re: Candle Cove local kid's show?
Wasn't his top hat and cloak all sewn up crazily? Was that supposed to be children's skin??
mike_painter65
Subject: Re: Candle Cove local kid's show?
yeah i think so. rememer his mouth didn't open and close, his jaw just slid back and foth. i remember the little girl said "why does your mouth move like that" and the skin-taker didn't look at the girl but at the camera and said "TO GRIND YOUR SKIN"
Skyshale033
Subject: Re: Candle Cove local kid's show?
I'm so relieved that other people remember this terrible show! I used to have this awful memory, a bad dream I had where the opening jingle ended, the show faded in from black, and all the characters were there, but the camera was just cutting to each of their faces, and they were just screaming, and the puppets and marionettes were flailing spastically, and just all screaming, screaming- The girl was just moaning and crying like she had been through hours of this- I woke up many times from that nightmare- I used to wet the bed when I had
kevin_hart
Subject: Re: Candle Cove local kid's show?
i don't think that was a dream. i remember that. i remember that was an episode.
Skyshale033
Subject: Re: Candle Cove local kid's show?
No no no, not possible. There was no plot or anything, I mean literally just standing in place crying and screaming for the whole show.
kevin_hart
Subject: Re: Candle Cove local kid's show?
maybe i'm manufacturing the memory because you said that, but i swear to god i remember seeing what you described. they just screamed.
Jaren 2005
Subject: Re: Candle Cove local kid's show?
Oh God. Yes. The little girl, Janice, I remember seeing her shake. And the Skin-Taker screaming through his gnashing teeth, his jaw careening so wildly I thought it would come off its wire hinges. I turned it off and it was the last time I watched. I ran to tell my brother and we didn't have the courage to turn it back on.
mike_painter65
Subject: Re: Candle Cove local kid's show?
i visited my mom today at the nursing home. i asked her about when i was littel in the early 70s, when i was 8 or 9 and if she remebered a kid's show, candle cove. she said she was suprised i could remember that and i asked why, and she said "because i used to think it was so strange that you said 'i'm gona go watch candle cove now mom' and then you would tune the tv to static and juts watch dead air for 30 minutes. you had a big imagination with your little pirate show."
EDIT:
Thanks to the wonders of the communication age, I was able to find a couple of episodes online.
Here is the infamous last episode... I told you it was, erm, odd: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o2h5ym6ZlVY
Here's another episode from the show... the part where he talks about "to grind your skin" really creeped (creeps) me out: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjP6eVDjuIM - Feb 24, 10What is the plural of octopus? 'Octopodes', 'octopi', and 'octopuses' get thrown about, but which is most correct?
First of all, 'octopuses' is reached simply by applying the classical rules of English pluralization to the word octopus, rendering it a grammatically - though not traditionally - correct plural form.
'Octopi' originated due to a mistaken assumption that the word octopus is Latin in origin. This is an easy mistake to make, considering that 'octo' is the Latin word for eight, and the '-us' ending suggests a Latin word suffix of the second declension. However, it is significant to note that the Latin word 'octo' actually derives from the Greek word 'okto', also meaning eight.
Were octopus a Latin word, it would actually be spelt 'octopes' (falling in the fifth declension), and be pluralized as 'octopedes'.
Arguably, the most correct plural of octopus is 'octopodes'. The reason for this is because, as hinted at earlier, the word octopus actually derives from the Greek (not Latin) word 'oktopous' which is pluralized in the form 'oktopodes'. This use is, however, comparatively rare.
Surely a grammar lesson can't be all this post is about, so I'll throw in some amusing octopus-related anecdotes:
I love octopus; it is just the most amazing creature. Once, when I was snorkelling, I happened to notice this lazy bit of weed sprouting, unusually, out of a hole with the hollowed out head of a cray fish attached to it. As my eye is usually tuned to such things, I decided to get a closer look and, of course, it turned out to be an octopus... fishing!
You see, he was just sitting in his hole, lazily dangling a tentacle out of it, using the crayfish to attract small whiting and other fish stupids to his lair; as soon as they'd come in for a quick feed - BANG! - out he'd shoot, grab 'em, and into his hole he'd go. I watched him fishing like that for about an hour, and it was truly fascinating the way that little arm swung around in the current, just lolling about with his craftily deployed crayfish head. Brilliant little buggers.
On another occasion, I found an octopus at low tide, all holed up. Ran back to the flats and scooped up a handful of soldier crabs, and returned to the occy hole to drop them, one by one, around his lair. I've never been more tickled than by seeing this little bugger drop out first one arm for a fat juicy soldier crab, then another, then another, until eventually he had six independent battles going on simultaneously, and still he wouldn't let go of any of them. Of course, once he'd retreated with his fat cache o' crab, I dropped a little gold coin in the sunshine right out his lair, and he darted out, leaving the real treasure behind, to take a look. Out he came, and then less than a heartbeat later, about twelve soldier crabs too, very mildly chewed, scattering off over the sands.
If you're ever watching an octopus be sure to have something shiny to lure them around with; they simply can't stand not to possess the shine. I've had them crawl all over me and follow me for hours just trying to get the gold coins out of the mesh pockets in my snorkel trunks. - Feb 10, 10
What with Facebook changing their layout into a redundant, buggy mess yet again, some of my friends asked me to write a rant about the situation. Well, seeing as I don't really care anymore, here's a rant for you:
Write it yourselves if you feel so strongly about it! Or how about this, stop whining and don't use a service you don't like and are in no way paying for!
However, if you do need my wit to validate your own opinions, then I'm sure you're already aware of the fact that I have addressed this issue in the past. Sure that article is boring and outdated now, but it's still better than anything you could come up with.
No, today I have decided to tackle a real and serious issue that has been vexing me greatly: Cow farts.
Studies show that cows emit massive amounts of methane through burping and farting. Methane, of course, is a major contributor to global warming and is 23 times more powerful than carbon dioxide. Some experts say that the average dairy cow emits up to 500 liters of methane per day, which is comparable to the average car on the road. As we know, cars are a major contributing factor to the fact[1] of global warming.
An ongoing study by Welsh scientists is examining whether feeding cows garlic can have an impact on cow flatulence. Early results suggest that a garlic based diet reduces cow farts by 50%, but result in disgusting milk.
Other efforts include a Fart Tax proposed by the government of New Zealand which was not adopted because it's fucking stupid.
What can be done about the problem? Personally, I suggest a re-evaluation of the beef industry. In a world where overpopulation is rife and we don't know what to do with unwanted children, the elderly or the homeless, do we really need to look towards another species as a source of dietary meat?
[1] Not really. For an intelligent and totally unbiased look at global warming from an unbiased perspective, see this article. Oh, did I mention it's in no way biased whatsoever? Because it's not.
-
Tweets
- "I've always looked after your creatures, God. Why did you have to take mine?"May 20, 12 from web Reply, Retweet, Favorite
- @janetvaneeden Thanks for that :)
- The answer is no. In some cases no means maybe, but maybe always means yes.May 07, 12 from web Reply, Retweet, Favorite
- Hypothesis: Kubrick's Dr. Strangelove is not a war film. It's an allegory for the frustration of erectile dysfunction. Yes, I am serious.May 07, 12 from web Reply, Retweet, Favorite
- Joyce: "I'm sorry, Sir. I thought you were the enemy." Shears: "Well, I'm an American, if that's what you mean."May 07, 12 from web Reply, Retweet, Favorite
- Too Saturday. Can't brain.
- @MaraWritesStuff it's Saturday already? Ah, man. I need to lay off the pot.
- @infixum my condolences. Can't imagine what you're feeling. If you need a friend...
- Three blokes go into a pub. Something happens. The outcome was hilarious!May 04, 12 from web Reply, Retweet, Favorite
- I sat through the entire running time of Iron Lady hoping for a Samuel L. Jackson cameo after the end credits. #fbMay 01, 12 from web Reply, Retweet, Favorite
-
Recent Tracks
- Somebody to Love by Queen
- Somebody to Love by Queen
- Crazy thing called loved by Queen
- Crazy thing called loved by Queen
- Middlesex Times by Michael Andrews
- Peaches en Regalia by Frank Zappa
- Peaches en Regalia by Frank Zappa
- Mowgli's Road by Marina & the Diamonds
- Peaches en Regalia by Frank Zappa
- La Campanella by Franz Liszt
RadioheadThe BeatlesMuseAkira YamaokaThe SmithsMogwaiJeff BuckleyBoards of CanadaPrimusRed Hot Chili PeppersMartin GrechThe Matches65daysofstaticJonny GreenwoodMichael AndrewsClint MansellJimi HendrixThe WhoSigur RósBjörkJohn LennonRichard CheeseBob DylanToolPink FloydBeirutDavid BowieQueenDepeche ModeBlurGåteThe Beach BoysRammsteinThe MonkeesR.E.M.DeftonesThe DoorsSystem of a DownDropkick MurphysChristopher O'RileyDJ ShadowCypress HillThe Rolling StonesSimon & GarfunkelSouth ParkPublic EnemyThe ProdigyThe Conet ProjectEminemLed Zeppelin- 74 plays
- 46 plays
- Panic by The Smiths40 plays
- 38 plays
- 37 plays
- Take a Bow by Muse37 plays
- 37 plays
- 37 plays
- 36 plays
- 36 plays
- 34 plays
- 32 plays
- 31 plays
- 31 plays
- 31 plays
- 31 plays
- 29 plays
- 28 plays
- Micro Cuts by Muse28 plays
- 28 plays
- 28 plays
- 27 plays
- 27 plays
- 26 plays
- 26 plays
- 26 plays
- 25 plays
- 25 plays
- 25 plays
- 25 plays
- 24 plays
- 24 plays
- 24 plays
- Push by Martin Grech23 plays
- 23 plays
- 22 plays
- 22 plays
- 22 plays
- 22 plays
-
Photos
-
Posts
- May 07 2012, 08:45
The Avengers (2012)
Rating: 77
Review: This is the most successful attempt I have yet seen of directly translating a comic in the Marvel style to the big screen. Whether this is a good or a bad thing is open to interpretation. Exactly what you'd expect: a slightly vaporous (but Whedon-esquely sharp) script which ties together various big-budget SFX sequences. Whedon doesn't try to be Chris Nolan, and as a result produces a film which is pure fun, devoid of any pretension. Definitely worth seeing at the theatre.Criticker.com - the Best Movie Recommendations on the Net! - Apr 28, 12Apr 28 2012, 17:07
Thor (2011)
Rating: 47
Review: The script serves no purpose other than to link together various SFX heavy set-pieces which are - with few exceptions - superfluous. In today's world of the gritty, hyperreal superhero film, the story feels as though it would've worked better in an animated setting where suspension of disbelief stretches just that little bit further. A great cast collectively phone it in, but you can't blame them: their paper thin characters are entirely defined by their abilities instead of their personalities.Criticker.com - the Best Movie Recommendations on the Net! - Nov 15, 11Nov 15 2011, 15:26
Jack and Jill (2011)
Rating: 3
Review: If you're in any way related to Adam Sandler, there's a good chance that you'll be crying in the shower at some point during this film's first week of release. Personally, I'm quite excited to see what Mr. Sandler does next, but only if what he does next is retire.Criticker.com - the Best Movie Recommendations on the Net! - Nov 04 2011, 14:09
The Experiment (2010)
Rating: 70
Review:Criticker.com - the Best Movie Recommendations on the Net! - Oct 26, 11Oct 26 2011, 06:21
Abduction (2011)
Rating: 0
Review: Let's get tothe brass tacks here: Abduction is not only the worst film ever made, it is the worst THING humanity had ever devised. I'd personally rate it a notch or two higher than the Holocaust. Taylor Lautner plays his part with an emotional range that would make Arnold Schwarzenegger look like Alec Guinness. The truly terrifying thing is that his acting is not the worst part of the film. I recently heard a rumor that owning a copy of Abduction in Germany is punishable by five years in prison.Criticker.com - the Best Movie Recommendations on the Net! - Sep 22, 11Sep 22 2011, 07:08
Ip Man (2008)
Rating: 79
Review: An excellent bit of nationalist filmmaking by the Chinese. Aside from the Japanese being presented as almost comic book villains, the film is rather strong throughout. Solid acting and provocative drama are punctuated by excellently choreographed fight sequences. Donnie Yen is excellent as the tortured Wing Chun grandmaster.Criticker.com - the Best Movie Recommendations on the Net! - Aug 30, 11Aug 30 2011, 04:47
Limitless (2011)
Rating: 69
Review: The film isn't terribly good, but the premise is fascinating in a Philip K. Dick sort of way.Criticker.com - the Best Movie Recommendations on the Net! - Aug 18, 11Aug 18 2011, 17:04
In Bruges (2008)
Rating: 85
Review: A dark, endlessly surprising comedy about two hit-men sent to Belgium for two weeks after a hit goes wrong. In Bruges features a plot that can't be predicted, but only relished. Very rarely does such a film appear that seems to happen as it goes along, driven by the peculiarities of the characters. Every element of the plot, including the ending, is determined by the ethical choices of the characters, and not simple plot requirements. Just watch it, already.Criticker.com - the Best Movie Recommendations on the Net! - Aug 18, 11Aug 18 2011, 16:44
Transformers: Dark of the Moon (2011)
Rating: 26
Review: A visually ugly film with incoherent plot, wooden characters, and insipid dialog. One of the more unpleasant experiences I've had at the movies - and I was once mugged in a movie theater.Criticker.com - the Best Movie Recommendations on the Net! - Aug 17, 11Aug 17 2011, 11:22
A Beautiful Mind (2001)
Rating: 80
Review:Criticker.com - the Best Movie Recommendations on the Net! - May 17, 11May 17 2011, 15:10
The Fall (2008)
Rating: 85
Review:Criticker.com - the Best Movie Recommendations on the Net! - May 14, 11May 14 2011, 06:45
An Education (2009)
Rating: 76
Review:Criticker.com - the Best Movie Recommendations on the Net! - May 02 2011, 14:02
The Men Who Stare at Goats (2009)
Rating: 64
Review:Criticker.com - the Best Movie Recommendations on the Net! - May 02 2011, 14:01
Paranormal Activity 2 (2010)
Rating: 51
Review:Criticker.com - the Best Movie Recommendations on the Net! - Mar 22, 11Mar 22 2011, 14:01
The Hunt for Red October (1990)
Rating: 83
Review: In an absolute anomoly for Hollywood, we have a film that's not only an intellectual feast, but broke bank at the box office. Even if you don't care much for John Mctiernan's style, this is a far cry from either Die Hard or Predator. Suspense is maintained throughout on the back of good writing and great acting. By the time the end credits roll, you won't even realise that there were almost no action scenes whatsoever.Criticker.com - the Best Movie Recommendations on the Net! - Jan 16, 11Jan 16 2011, 11:24
The Social Network (2010)
Rating: 76
Review: A good script, good direction, good soundtrack and generally good acting. I have no real qualm with The Social Network aside from the fact that it may be the most overrated movie of the 21st century. It's not a bad film - it's above average in every department - but for the life of me I can't fathom why film critics are enjoying a collective circlejerk over it. Reccomended if you like Sorkin's writing, biopics, "business films" or Jesse Eisenberg. Just don't expect what they tell you to expect.Criticker.com - the Best Movie Recommendations on the Net! - Jan 16, 11Jan 16 2011, 04:31
Inception (2010)
Rating: 95
Review: A plot as interminable and labyrinthine as the dreamscapes it portrays elevates this subconscious heist smovie into the realm of truly great cinema. Nolan's masterpiece (well, until his next film comes out, by his standards). The pace is fast, but not breakneck; enough information is given so that repeated viewings - though welcome - won't be necessary to follow the plot; the acting is solid, especially from Gordon-Levitt who is marvelous.Criticker.com - the Best Movie Recommendations on the Net! - May 02 2010, 08:35
2012 (2009)
Rating: 46
Review: Endless scenes of cars flipping through the air, buildings toppling and airplanes being chased by lava, punctuated by painfully forced dialogue and so many cliches you'd think Emmerich was going for a Guinness record. 2012 would be worth watching if you're eight and the film wasn't 40 minutes too long. Only Roland Emmerich could turn a mammoth special effects budget into a yawning exercise for the audience.Criticker.com - the Best Movie Recommendations on the Net! - Apr 08 2010, 20:21
The Lost Boys (1987)
Rating: 84
Review: Even though I only saw this film for the first time when I had already reached adulthood, there's so much 80s teen nostalgia in this film that it feels as though it could've been the result had John Hughes ever tried his hand at horror. A cheesy but immensely enjoyable teen vampire flick. No Halloween movie night could be complete without it.Criticker.com - the Best Movie Recommendations on the Net! - Apr 08 2010, 20:17
Daybreakers (2010)
Rating: 46
Review: Take a dash of Good Idea, three slices of Good Actor, and a large saucepan of Fecal Matter. Allow to simmer mildly for 2 hours, and then serve in a knock-off Matrix serving dish. Voila, you have Daybreakers.Criticker.com - the Best Movie Recommendations on the Net! - Jan 23, 10Jan 23 2010, 17:54
A History of Violence (2005)
Rating: 77
Review:Criticker.com - the Best Movie Recommendations on the Net! - Jan 23, 10Jan 23 2010, 17:54
Sleepless in Seattle (1993)
Rating: 71
Review:Criticker.com - the Best Movie Recommendations on the Net! - Jan 23, 10Jan 23 2010, 17:53
Talladega Nights: The Ballad of Ricky Bobby (2006)
Rating: 82
Review:Criticker.com - the Best Movie Recommendations on the Net! - Jan 04 2010, 17:51
The Replacements (2000)
Rating: 52
Review: A by-the-numbers inspirational sports comedy. It's as predictable as the flooding of the Nile, but functions effectively if you don't think about it too much. Rhys Ifans steals the show, but in a film where everything is just about lukewarm, that isn't saying much.Criticker.com - the Best Movie Recommendations on the Net! - Jan 02 2010, 16:00
Alexander (2004)
Rating: 42
Review:Criticker.com - the Best Movie Recommendations on the Net!
